When Rachel Reeves wept: Why tears in politics are no bad thing

Rachel Reeves

Jemimah Wright reflects on the reactions to Rachel Reeves’s visible distress in Parliament and what this reveals about our expectations of emotional strength in leadership. 

A few days ago, Rachel Reeves, the Shadow Chancellor, did something almost shocking by Westminster’s standards: she cried. During Prime Minister’s Questions on 2nd July, she faced intense scrutiny after her government reversed key welfare reforms, leaving a nearly £5 billion hole in their budget. Amid probing questions from Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch and lukewarm support from Prime Minister, Keir Starmer at the dispatch box, Rachel Reeves appeared visibly emotional and wiped away tears. She later said, ‘I’d had a tough day,’ to explain her crying.

Many media outlets predictably leapt on her tears as a sign of weakness. But I believe showing our humanity is never weakness.

To continue reading, register today for more access!

If you are a member or a registered user, or if you already have a login for another Premier website SIGN IN HERE

 

Woman Alive magazine, website, tablet and phone

Sign up for your free account now!    

Registering is quick and easy and gives you immediate access to read more articles, plus:

  • You’ll receive a weekly newsletter every Saturday with the top stories of the week
  • You can save articles to read later
  • You can share your comments and thoughts on the stories

REGISTER NOW


Or become a member today for unlimited access! Special offers are available!

If you already have an account with a Premier website SIGN IN HERE